Tesla earnings face elevated expectations as options price smaller move
CNBC analysis says Tesla’s options market implies a 7% earnings swing, below its longer-run post-results average of about 9%.
By Amanda Ross · Deals Correspondent
· 3 min read
Tesla heads into its second-quarter earnings report on Wednesday with investor expectations already high after deliveries beat consensus forecasts, according to CNBC analysis. The same analysis said options prices imply a roughly 7% move around the release, below Tesla’s longer-term average post-earnings swing of about 9% over comparable two-day periods.
Tesla shares did not rise after the company reported stronger-than-expected second-quarter sales and delivery figures, CNBC said. The stock was recently quoted by CNBC at $372.56, down $8.28, or 2.17%, in Nasdaq last-sale data as of 1:22 p.m. EDT.
CNBC’s analysis argued that the share-price reaction to the delivery report points to a demanding setup for the electric-vehicle maker. In that reading, investors may treat an earnings beat as a minimum requirement rather than a positive surprise, leaving the stock exposed if results or commentary fall short of elevated expectations.
Competitive pressure and valuation questions
The report cited a cooler market mood toward pure-play electric-vehicle companies over the past two years, while noting that competition remains intense in key vehicle categories. It pointed to Rivian’s R2, which targets the $45,000 to $60,000 mass-market SUV segment, a price band that overlaps with Tesla’s Model 3 and Model Y franchise.
CNBC said the Model 3 and Model Y accounted for more than 96% of Tesla’s 2025 sales. It also noted that Rivian does not currently have the manufacturing capacity to displace Tesla’s highest-volume models, while arguing that strong demand for Rivian’s vehicle could help that company raise capital and expand production capacity.
The analysis also said Tesla’s valuation continues to depend in part on businesses outside current auto sales, including humanoid robotics through Optimus and full self-driving technology. CNBC said market appetite for artificial-intelligence narratives has shifted toward hardware suppliers with nearer-term financial returns rather than software concepts with longer payoffs.
Speculation about corporate actions or links involving SpaceX has also circulated, according to CNBC. The analysis said a merger or restructuring would have limited strategic logic for the core operations of either company and added that SpaceX shares were trading below their initial public valuation, reducing enthusiasm for cross-company financial engineering.
What the options market is pricing
CNBC said Tesla’s recent post-earnings moves have been more restrained than its longer-term average. The at-the-money straddle expiring July 24, using the $380 strike as an example, was priced at about 7% of the underlying stock price, compared with an average two-day post-earnings move of roughly 9% over a longer period.
A straddle combines a call and a put at the same strike and expiration. Traders often use its price as a market-implied estimate of how much a stock may move, without specifying direction. If the actual move is smaller than the option premium suggests, buyers can lose money even if they correctly identify volatility around the event.
CNBC also said implied volatility was slightly above last quarter’s level and that demand for puts remained elevated relative to calls. It noted that buying options outright can leave traders exposed to a decline in implied volatility after earnings, a common post-event effect known as volatility crush.
The options structure described by CNBC was a short-term bear put spread: buying the August 21 $360 put for $15 and selling the August 21 $330 put for $6. The net cost cited was $9, or $900 per spread, with a maximum gain of $2,100 if Tesla falls to $330 by August expiration.
In such a spread, the purchased put gains value as the stock declines below the higher strike, while the sold put helps reduce the upfront cost and partially offsets time decay and volatility exposure. The trade also caps the potential profit at the difference between the strikes less the net premium paid.
This story draws on original reporting from CNBC.