Markets Open
Global Markets
S&P 500 7,511.37 ▲ +0.4% DOW 52,856.58 ▼ -0.1% NASDAQ 26,041.38 ▲ +0.8% RUSSELL 2K 2,996.11 ▼ -0.5% VIX 16.49 ▲ +2.1% GOLD 4,158.1 ▲ +1.1% CRUDE OIL 68.84 ▲ +0.2% EUR/USD 1.14 ▼ -0.0% BTC 61,434 ▼ -2.0% ETH 1,735.82 ▼ -1.6%
Opinion

US payroll gain falls short as household jobs measure weakens

Nonfarm payrolls rose 57,000, about half the consensus estimate, while household-based employment measures pointed to a weakening labor trend.

Ingrid Halvorsen

By Ingrid Halvorsen · Staff Writer

· 3 min read

US nonfarm payrolls increased by 57,000 in the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics release, well below the 114,000 consensus estimate cited by Econbrowser, while earlier months were revised lower. The report keeps establishment-survey employment above the level associated with a stable unemployment rate, according to Econbrowser, but household-based employment measures are moving down.

Econbrowser’s business-cycle review compared payrolls with civilian employment, industrial production, real personal income excluding current transfers, real manufacturing and trade sales, monthly GDP from S&P Global Market Insights, and official GDP from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The series were indexed to January 2025 to show their relative movement across the current cycle.

The payroll survey, also known as the establishment survey, counts jobs reported by employers. The civilian employment measure comes from the household survey and counts people employed. Those two measures can diverge because they are drawn from different surveys and measure different concepts. Econbrowser also examined a civilian employment series adjusted to match the nonfarm payroll concept and smoothed with population controls.

That adjusted household measure has been declining on trend since January, according to Econbrowser’s calculations. The analysis cautioned that month-to-month changes in household-survey data are noisy, but described the direction of the trend as a concern.

Private payrolls also missed expectations

The weakness was not limited to public-sector employment. BLS private nonfarm payrolls rose 59,000, compared with a 110,000 consensus estimate cited by Econbrowser. ADP private payrolls also came in below consensus, according to the same analysis, although no figure was provided.

That pattern matters for interpretation because soft headline payroll growth can sometimes reflect cuts or hiring pauses in government employment. In this release, Econbrowser said the lackluster result could not be assigned to government employment cuts alone, given the below-consensus readings in private payroll measures.

The analysis also noted that first estimates of payroll changes can be revised materially. In 2025, the mean absolute revision in month-on-month employment changes from the first to the third release was 53,000, according to Econbrowser. On that basis, the second release could show an upward revision, although the initial data point to a clear slowing in jobs growth.

Output measures look firmer than labor measures

Econbrowser’s alternative dashboard included civilian employment adjusted to the payroll concept, manufacturing production, ADP private payroll employment, CPI-deflated real retail sales, freight services indexes, a coincident index, and gross domestic output. The figures drew on BLS data, ADP via FRED, the Philadelphia Fed, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, the Federal Reserve, the BEA’s third estimate for the first quarter of 2026, and Econbrowser calculations.

One notable split was between output-based measures and labor-market-based measures. Econbrowser said the coincident index was rising more slowly than official GDP or the monthly GDP estimate from S&P Global Market Insights, reflecting the index’s heavier reliance on labor-market indicators.

The result is a mixed business-cycle signal. Payroll employment is still expanding in the establishment survey, but civilian employment measured in persons has been weakening since the start of the year. Econbrowser described the latest report as a noticeable downshift in employment growth, with the adjusted household employment series declining despite the use of consistent population controls.

This story draws on original reporting from Econbrowser.

More from Opinion

All Opinion →